Assessee,
a share broker, purchased shares on behalf of his clients and paid money in
respect of the same from his own pockets. Brokerage receivable by him was shown
as income in his books of accounts. Since the sum paid by him couldn’t be
received from the clients, he wrote off the same as “bad-debts”. AO denied the
said claim since he was of the view that condition prescribed u/s 36(2) was not
satisfied. On appeal, the Hon’ble ITAT, Ahmedabad held that the money
receivable from clients had to be treated as “debt” and since it became bad, it
was rightly claimed as “bad-debts”. Since the brokerage payable by the clients
was a part of the debt and that debt had been taken into account in computation
of income, conditions prescribed u/s 36(2) r.w.s. 36(1)(vii) stood satisfied.
Hence, the assessee was entitled to the deduction of the said bad-debts.
Hon’ble ITAT followed the ratio laid down in the case of Bonanza Portfolio Ltd.
– 320 ITR 178 (Delhi).
[ACIT
vs. Cannon Capital and Finance Ltd. – ITA No.1578/Ahd/2012]
No comments:
Post a Comment