AO
made disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) in respect of expenditure incurred by the
assessee for the purpose of developing housing projects since the assessee had
not deducted tax at source as per the requirements of the Act. Hon’ble High
Court held that such disallowance would ultimately go to increase the
assessee’s profit from the business of developing housing projects. Deduction
u/s 80IB(10) was already allowed to the assessee by following the decision in
the case of “CIT vs. Radhe Developers – 341 ITR 403 (Guj)”. Hence, profit
computed after disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) would qualify for deduction u/s
80IB(10). Revenue’s appeal was dismissed accordingly.
[ITO
Vs. KEVAL CONSTRUCTION - TAX APPEAL NO.443 of 2012 – GHC]
No comments:
Post a Comment