A
survey u/s 133A took place at the assessee firm’s premises during the course of
which certain excess stock and excess cash were found. AO levied penalty on the
said amounts representing unaccounted stock and unaccounted cash by invoking Explanation 5 to S.271(1)(c). On appeal,
the Hon’ble ITAT observed that the assessee firm had furnished its return of
income which included the unaccounted income on account of excess stock and
excess cash. Tax arising thereon was duly paid and the said return of income
was accepted u/s 143(3). Further, the said disclosure was made during the
course of survey u/s 133A and not during the course of search u/s 132. Explanation 5 can be invoked in case of search
initiated u/s 132 and not in case of survey u/s 133A. Further, the said amounts
were included in the return of income and the said return was accepted by AO.
Hence, it cannot be said that the assessee had concealed its income or
furnished inaccurate particulars of income. Also, there cannot be any
concealment prior to furnishing return of income. In light of the above, the
penalty was deleted.
[BHARAT
STEEL SUPPLIERS VS. ACIT – ITA NOS.1546-47/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment