AO
made addition u/s 41(1) in respect of “sundry creditors for exports” appearing
in Balance-sheet since the same were outstanding for last few years. On appeal,
CIT(A) observed that S.41(1) comes into play when an assessee obtains, in cash
or in kind, any amount out of the expenditure allowed earlier. Alternatively,
assessee must have obtained benefit by way of remission or cessation of trading
liability. The third scenario in which the provisions can be invoked is when
the assessee unilaterally writes off the liability. In the given case, none of
the above mentioned events took place. It was also observed that the said
liability continued to be outstanding even at the end of given year. Hence,
CIT(A) deleted the said addition. On Revenue’s appeal, Hon’ble ITAT held that
CIT(A)’s order was in conformity with the decision in the case of “CIT vs.
Nitin S. Garg – 22 taxmann.com 59 (Guj)” and hence, no interference was
required in CIT(A)’s order. Accordingly, Revenue’s appeal was dismissed.
[ACIT
vs. Gopal Fabrics – ITA No.3338/Ahd/2010 and 463/Ahd/2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment