AO
found that the assessee-company is a partner in several partnership firms and
has earned profits from such firms which have been claimed as exempt u/s
10(2A). Also, the assessee had paid interest on unsecured loans during the year
under consideration. AO therefore took a view that assessee invested such
borrowed funds in various partnership firms and earned exempted income.
Consequently, he made disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D. Hon’ble ITAT observed
that the assessee had sufficient own funds and hence, it was of the view that
it was unfair on the part of revenue to presume that borrowed funds had been
utilised for the purpose of making investment in such partnership firms. It was
further observed that interest income earned by the assessee was more than the
interest expenditure. Hon’ble ITAT, following the order in the case of “ITO vs.
Karnavati Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. – ITA No.2228/Ahd/2012”, held that when the
interest income was more than interest expense, AO was not justified in
invoking the provisions of S.14A r.w.r. 8D. Accordingly, the impugned addition
was deleted.
[Safal
Reality Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT – ITA Nos.2334/Ahd/2012 & 1842/Ahd/2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment