AO
disallowed business expenditure being payment made by the assessee to the
electricity board on the count that the same was expended towards penalty. ITAT
observed that the assessee had to pay higher charges to the electricity board
for failing to consume contracted amount of electricity, which as per the
agreement would result into higher rate of electricity charges. Hence, ITAT
held that such amount could not have been disallowed. While holding so, ITAT
permitted the AO to verify that the charges were levied for the period prior to
the sale of property. On Revenue’s appeal, Hon’ble High Court also held that merely
because the assessee failed to consume minimum committed electricity and
therefore ended up paying higher rate of electricity, such payment cannot be
categorised as penalty. ITAT had, therefore, correctly deleted the
disallowance. Accordingly, Revenue’s appeal was dismissed.
[CIT
Vs. Rajkot Jilla Co. Op. Cotton Marketing Union Ltd. – Tax Appeal No.797 of 2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment