AO found that the assessee-HUF had paid interest @ 15%
p.a. to its two Coparceners on loans advance by such coparceners to the
assessee-HUF as against interest @ 12% p.a. to other parties. Hence, AO made an
addition to the extent of differential interest @ 3% u/s 40A(2)(b) of the Act.
Hon’ble ITAT was of the view that in light of the prevailing rate of interest
during the relevant assessment year, 15% rate of interest was not found to be
excessive. Further, the loans raised from such coparceners can be safely relied
upon by the assessee-HUF since such coparceners may not demand the amount of
loan back in the near future and the level of confidentiality was obviously
more with respect to such coparceners. In light of the aforesaid facts, it was
held that interest at the rate of 15% can’t be said to be excessive and the
provisions of S.40A(2)(b) were wrongly invoked. Hence, the said addition was
deleted.
[SHRI HITESH NARENDRABHAI SHAH (HUF) Vs. ITO – ITA
No.2370/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment