Assesse
had paid “Vehicle hiring charges” during the year under consideration and had
deducted tax at source u/s 194C. AO was of the view that the assessee ought to
have deducted tax u/s 194I and hence, he passed and order u/s 201(1), making
huge addition on that count. The Hon’ble ITAT observed that S.194C
categorically covers “Transportation”. The contractor was obliged to provide
particular type of vehicle but not the same vehicle. Such contractor was to
bear the cost of running and maintenance, repair and insurance, etc. and was
obliged to provide another similar vehicle in case of break down. Even the
assessee was to make payment on the basis of kms travelled and not any fixed
amount. Such vehicles were, at all times, under the supervision and control of
the said contractor. Hence, such contract was for carrying out specific work
for the assessee and it cannot be said that a vehicle has been taken on hire.
Further, vehicle hiring charges are not covered vide S.194I. Hence, it was held
that S.194C is applicable and not S.194I. Accordingly, the addition in respect
of the same was deleted.
[ACIT
VS. GUJARAT STATE PETRONET LTD. – ITA NO.3371/Ahd 2010 & CO 17/Ahd/2011]
No comments:
Post a Comment