Appellant
had shown certain income on sale of shares as long term capital gain and
certain part of income as income from speculative business of trading in
shares. AO treated the said capital gain as speculation income, made an
addition in respect of the same and levied penalty. Hon’ble ITAT observed that
transactions in respect of shares were duly disclosed at the time of filing
return of income. Appellant had disclosed names of the companies, description
of shares, date of transfer of shares, sale consideration, cost of acquisition
and the indexed cost. Accordingly, the appellant had worked out long term
capital gain. Explanation offered by the appellant was not found satisfactory
by AO and therefore he treated the same as speculation income. But there was no
allegation as to concealment of facts or dealings in sham transactions. Since
the addition was made merely because of change in head of income, penalty was
deleted.
[M/s.
Crown Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT – ITA No.2768/Ahd/2012]
No comments:
Post a Comment