AO
levied penalty on addition made in respect of income from coaching classes.
Hon’ble ITAT observed that the in the original assessment, the said addition
was made on “Protective basis”. Secondly, such addition was made on the basis
of estimation of tuition income. Thirdly, in the assessment order, AO had initiated
penalty proceedings for concealing the particulars of income and for furnishing
inaccurate particulars of income which shows that there was no clear cut
finding as to the type of default committed by the assessee. In light of the
above, Hon’ble ITAT deleted the said penalty.
[Sonalben
Pareshkumar Dave vs. ITO – ITA No.2318 to 2323/Ahd/2012]
No comments:
Post a Comment