Appellant
raised a technical ground before the Hon’ble ITAT that AO’s order was bad in
law since there was no requisite satisfaction recorded in order to assume
jurisdiction u/s 158BD. Hon’ble ITAT was of the view that requisite
satisfaction must be recorded by AO of the person searched in order to assume
jurisdiction u/s 158BD. If no such satisfaction is recorded by AO of the person
searched, then no proceedings can be initiated u/s 158BD. It was observed that
CIT(A) had not given such finding as to satisfaction by AO since no specific
ground was raised by the appellant before him although the ground that AO’s
order was bad in law and must be quashed was raised. Hence, the matter was
restored to the file of CIT(A) for fresh decision with a direction that if
proper jurisdiction is not assumed by AO, the assessment needs to be quashed
and if proper jurisdiction has been assumed, then the issues must be decided on
merits.
[Jaydeep
Enterprises vs. ACIT – IT(SS)A No.37/Ahd/2005]
No comments:
Post a Comment