Assessee
was engaged in the business of import and export of diamonds. He entered into
forward exchange contract in respect of import and export transactions in order
to protect its interest against the fluctuation in the rate of foreign exchange
currency. On cancellation of such contracts, assessee was entitled to either
profit or loss depending upon the rated contracted and the rates prevailing at
the time of cancellation. During the year under consideration, the assessee
earned income on such forward contracts on account of fluctuations in foreign
exchange. AO held that such income was “Speculative income” in light of the
provisions of S.43(5). On appeal, the Hon’ble ITAT held that profit arising on
cancellation of such forward contracts is an integral part of such business and
provisions of S.43(5) shall not apply in such cases. Hence, the said income should
be treated as “Business income” and not “Speculation income”.
[M/S.
VEER GEMS Vs. ACIT – ITA NO.2478/Ahd/2009]
No comments:
Post a Comment