AO
noticed that the assessee had received certain unsecured loans. According to
him, since the said amounts were not received through account payee cheques,
provisions of S.269SS were violated and hence, penalty was levied u/s 271D.
Hon’ble ITAT observed that the assessee had entered into an agreement with the
concerned persons according to which those persons infused funds in the
business of the assessee. The said funds were not in the nature of unsecured loans
but were in the nature of capital contribution since those parties had share in
the profits and losses of the assessee. Those persons had incurred certain
expenses on behalf of the assessee for restarting assessee’s business including
buying the machinery and the accounts of the said persons were credited by
passing a J.V. in the books of accounts. As per Explanation (iii) to S.269SS, “loan or deposit” means loan or
deposit “of money”. Transfer between two accounts by way of journal entry does
not imply receipt of loan or deposit in monetary terms. It was thus held that
there was no violation of S.269SS and consequently, there was no question of
levying penalty u/s 271D.
[ITO
Vs. SHRI MINESHKUMAR SHANTILAL PATEL – ITA NO.643/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment