AO
issued a notice u/s 148 describing the petitioner as an agent of a foreign
company i.e. a non-resident without passing an order u/s 163(2)treatingthe
petitioner as an agent of the foreign company. On filing a Writ petition, the
Hon’ble High Court held that the said notice was time barred as per the provisions
of S.149(3) as the same was issued after the expiry of two years from the end
of relevant assessment year. It was further held that the impugned notice was
to be quashed as no order was passed u/s 163(2) prior to issuance of the said
notice.Further, the notice was also liable to be quashed on the ground of
incongruity as the notice u/s 148 described the petitioner as an agent of the
foreign company whereas earlier, AO had issued notice u/s 163(1) to the
petitioner asking him to show cause as to why he should not be treated as an
agent of some third person and not the said foreign company.
[ARVIND
MILL LTD. - TAX APPEAL Nos.8857 & 8858 of 2003 - GHC]
No comments:
Post a Comment