Assessee
challenged the penalty order before CIT by moving a revision application u/s
264 which was rejected by CIT on two grounds viz. (1) The issue in quantum
appeal has not attained finality since the Hon’ble High Court had admitted quantum
appeal preferred by the Revenue against order of ITAT deleting the concerned
additions on which penalty was levied & (2)Revision proceedings are
contemplated only to mitigate the situation faced by the assessee who are
unable to approach appellate authorities for relief. It was held by the Hon’ble
High Court that in case CIT was inclined to decide the Revision petition
without waiting for High Court’s decision in quantum appeal, he was duty bound
to apply the order of ITAT as it stood at that time. It was further held that the
fact that the assessee had preferred appeal against quantum additions would not
take away his right to file revision application against the penalty order.
[ARYAMAN
SPINNERS PVT. LTD. - SCA 10636 of 2012 - GHC]
No comments:
Post a Comment