AO
made addition on account of excessive expenses which was deleted by both the
lower appellate authorities. On Revenue’s appeal, the Hon’ble High Court
observed that AO made the said addition by merely making a comparative study of
the expenses for the year under consideration with the preceding the Asst. Year
without pointing out as to which of the expenses incurred by the assessee were
not connected with the business activity of the assessee or were not admissible
in law.It was held that in absence of any specific pin-pointing, AO could not
have made the addition merely by comparing expenditure with the preceding
year’s expenditure. Revenue’s appeal was dismissed accordingly.
[SYMPHONY
COMFORT SYSTEM LTD. - TAX APPEAL NO.1501 of 2011 - GHC]
No comments:
Post a Comment