If documents seized during a Search action are found
to be “Dumb documents”, then in
absence of any evidence that such documents unearthed a concealed business
activity of the assessee, addition made on the basis of the same by placing
reliance on S.132(4A) remains un-corroborated and needs to be deleted.If an
addition is to be made on the basis of seized documents, then it must be
supported by “some identification”
having nexus with unaccounted business activity of the assessee. It was further
held that S.132(4A) uses the words “may
presume” which imply that such presumption is rebuttable.
[DHARMENDRASINH
R. WAGHELA (TAX APPEAL NO.1539 of 2011 - GHC]
No comments:
Post a Comment