AO
made an addition on account of water and service charges. Ld. CIT(A) recorded
that the assessee had not pressed the said ground since the same was decided
against the assessee in earlier years. Assessee preferred an appeal before ITAT
and submitted that CIT(A) had wrongly recorded the same. ITAT observed that the
DR had not brought anything on record to show the said issue was decided against
the assessee in earlier years. Hence, ITAT restored the matter to the file of
AO to decide the issue afresh after giving reasonable opportunity of being
heard to the assessee alongwith certain directions. On Revenue’s appeal,
Hon’ble High Court held that the order of ITAT required no interference and
accordingly, revenue’s appeal was dismissed.
[CIT
vs. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. – Tax Appeal No. 816 of 2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment