AO
levied penalty on the addition made in respect of bad-debts. Hon’ble ITAT
observed that the assessee had earlier sold factory shed but couldn’t recover
entire sale proceeds and hence, the unrealized sum was claimed as bad-debts. AO
was of the view that since the transaction as to sale of factory shed was not a
trading transaction, loss on account of non-realization of such sale proceeds
was a capital loss and hence, it wasn’t allowable as bad-debts. It was further
observed that the claim of bad-debts was duly reflected in P&L a/c as well
as return of income. It was not the case that the assessee had not disclosed
the amount or had concealed the particulars of income. Assessee’s contention
was that it was of bona fide view that since amount written off was out of
amount that had already been offered to tax, it was eligible for the claim of
bad-debts and such bona fide belief of the assessee had not been controverted
by the Revenue by bringing any tangible material on record. Hence, relying on
the decisions in the cases of “Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT – 348
ITR 306 (SC)”, the penalty was deleted.
[M/S.
POONAM PROTEINS PVT. LTD. Vs. ITO – ITA No.1626/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment