Assessee,
engaged in the business of running rice mill, claimed additional depreciation
on plant and machinery which came to be disallowed by AO since he was of the
view that the assessee was not engaged in the manufacture/production of any
article. Hon’ble ITAT held that the assessee rice is manufactured/produced after
a cumbersome process applied on paddy and the commodity so manufactured cannot
be regarded or used as the original commodity. Rather, rice is a distinct
commodity than the raw material used (i.e. paddy) either considering the usage
or marketability of the product. Hence, the assessee was rightly eligible for
additional depreciation.
[M/S.
VIJAYALAXMI RICE MILL Vs. ITO – ITA 2205/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment