AO
disallowed commission paid to the commission agents at a rate ranging between 3
to 5% which was partly deleted by Ld. CIT(A). On further appeal, Hon’ble ITAT
observed that AO made the said disallowance on the general observations and had
merely given the theory of commission allowable u/s 37. AO had not pointed out
any specific instance on the basis of which such commission can be held to be bogus.
The fact is that such commission was paid on the basis of sales made through
such agents. Assessee had established the identity of such agents.
Confirmation, ITRs, Balance-sheet, P&L a/c and bank statement of the payees
were also furnished which proved that such payees had shown the concerned
commission receipts as income. Such commission was paid either during the year
under consideration or in the subsequent year. Assessee had even established
the consistency of payment of such commission. No disallowance was made on
account of such commission paid in earlier years. In light of the above, the
said disallowance was fully deleted by the Hon’ble ITAT.
[M/s.
Heatex Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. – DCIT – ITA Nos.2695 & 2752/Ahd/2012]
Hi, You explained the topic very well. The contents has provided meaningful information thanks for sharing info.
ReplyDeleteLow real estate commission
Hi, You explained the topic very well. The contents has provided meaningful information thanks for sharing info.
ReplyDeleteLow real estate commission