AO
made addition u/s 41(1) in respect of sales tax refund. Hon’ble ITAT observed
that the appellant-firm had, during the year under consideration, transferred
all its assets and liabilities to M/s. Hemraj Trading Co. (HMT) and the said
sales tax refund was received by HMT subsequent to such transfer. Earlier,
Hon’ble ITAT had set aside the said matter to the file of AO with a direction
to tax the said sum in the hands of the assessee only if such sales tax refund
has been given by HMT to the partners of the appellate-firm. In the second
round of litigation, the partners of the assessee-firm had placed their
affidavits before AO stating that they haven’t received such refund. Still, AO
made the said addition which was confirmed by CIT(A). It was thus held that the
addition so made was against the directions of the Hon’ble ITAT and hence, the
same was deleted. However, the Hon’ble ITAT stated in its order that the
revisionary authorities under the sales tax realised their mistake and had
demanded such refund back from HMT along with interest. Further, the said
matter was under litigation. Hence, in case such refund was received by
partners of the appellant-firm, then AO shall be free to proceed as per law.
[VIRAJ
TRADING CO. & ORS. Vs. ITO – ITA Nos.2588 to 2590/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment