AO
disallowed remuneration paid to partners u/s 40(b). Hon’ble ITAT observed that
the assessee had disclosed certain additional income during the course of
survey u/s 133A as “Business income” in respect of excess stock and claimed
deduction in respect of remuneration to partners on such additional business
income. AO treated the said income as “Income from other sources” and
consequently disallowed deduction u/s 40(b). The assessee had made disclosure
in respect of excess stock as business income as was apparent from the statement
recorded u/s 133A. Further, Revenue had not brought on record any evidence that
the appellant had any other sources of income other than that disclosed by the
assessee. It was thus held that such income was business income and qualified
for the purpose of remuneration to partners.
[DCIT Vs. M/S. NEW RAMESH KIRANA STORES – ITA
Nos.1891/Ahd/2010]
Do u have any judgement of pune tribunal parallel to new ramesh kirana
ReplyDeleteNo idea sir.. But you can quote the aforesaid judgment in case the same is applicable keeping in mind facts of your case. Order of a co-ordinate bench is binding on all the benches of ITAT. If a bench refuses to follow the same, a request for formation of a special bench can be made.
Delete