A
search took place at the residence of the assessee and certain jewellery was
found. AO didn’t consider the plea of the assessee that such jewellery was
received on marriage and various other auspicious occasions. He therefore
allowed benefit of 200 gms of jewellery per married lady and 100 gms per male
member and made an addition in respect of the access amount towards unaccounted
investment in jewellery. Hon’ble ITAT took a view that as per CBDT’s
instruction no.1916, jewellery to the extent of 500 gms per married lady and
100 gms per male member is considered to be reasonable for not seized at the
time of search. Further, it was also mentioned that various High Courts have
interpreted this limitation of seizure as explained as jewellery received by
them on marriage and other occasions. In light of the above, the Hon’ble ITAT
upheld the order of CIT(A) deleting the said addition.
[ACIT
Vs. YASH DEVENDRA VAYLA – ITA No.652/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment