AO
observed that the assessee had given certain plant and machinery on hire and
earned rental income. AO took a view that since such assets were not used for
assessee’s own business and hence, he disallowed proportionate depreciation in
such assets given on hire. Hon’ble ITAT observed that it was not the case of
Revenue that such assets given on hire were not at all used for assessee’s own
business for a single day during the year under consideration. Instead of
keeping such machinery idle, assessee hired out the same and earned rental
income. Hon’ble ITAT was of the view that even if such machinery remained idle
for part of the year, then also depreciation ought to have been allowed on such
assets. The fact that such machinery had been rented out had no consequence on allowance
of depreciation on machinery that had fallen within the block of assets for the
year under consideration and used for the business purpose for part of the year.
In light of the above, assessee’s claim of depreciation in such hired-out
assets was allowed.
[JSIW
INFRASTRCUTURE PVT. LTD. Vs. ACIT – ITA 348/Ahd/2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment