AO
denied deduction u/s 54EC to the appellant trust on the count that investments
in the bonds of RECL were made in the name of the trustees/beneficiaries of the
trust and not in the name of the assessee-trust. Hon’ble ITAT observed that the
assessee-trust was settled in accordance with the directions of Will of Late
Shri Popatlal N. Vora to hold and administer his properties and assets. As per
one of the clause of the Trust Deed, the period of distribution of the corpus
of the trust was 18 years from the death of Late Shri Popatlal N. Vora. Lock-in-period
for investments prescribed u/s 54EC is 3 years. Since the period of three years
from date of investment in bonds of RECL ended beyond the period of 18 years (as
mentioned above) at the end of which the corpus was to be distributed, it was
decided to make the said investment in RECL bonds in the name of the trustees/beneficiaries
of the assessee-trust. Following the view taken in the case of “ITO vs. Smt.
Saraswati Ramanathan – 116 ITD 234 (Delhi)”, the Hon’ble ITAT extended wider
and liberal interpretation to the term “assessee” used u/s 54EC and held that
the assessee-trust was rightly eligible for exemption u/s 54EC even if the
investment in the prescribed bonds has been made in the names of trustees/beneficiaries
of the assessee-trust.
[Popatlal
N. Vora Inheritance Trust vs. ITO – ITA No.2365/Ahd/2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment